%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 21 0 R ] /Count 2 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 12 0 R /F6 14 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 15 0 R /GS2 16 0 R /GS3 17 0 R /GS4 18 0 R /GS5 19 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20251014204845+00'00') /ModDate (D:20251014204845+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 2037 >> stream xX]6}F߶A͠E:mhEu~lsI˖36X,G? VKTM!j\f !0w m )FWY cy-(I/OkA?JkB#"Z7#8Ϛ,br] 7Q}j$2ʜGfq3@(* ,D QOItӥyKNIm:>^F>3D>OɢMǏp:7j|y>?eaʴ8?2rXQ"qG$SW(n)\<7a6m7tLkmoIXQKImF =4[FE_"?TZSNN獀"JU`ka^ DͩR]'+ ]D3P,,yk=:7R޹5 뉪U;YUI-E Dl@Jz}3pI[C\jE -Q^&%Nj@xxZź;1A^{m Q5/QHSꊸm5Љc´kì;Xd*1:dNjSm ؃C˞2Cz*4}؇Rt(]K0+4z;ԈFهL,ĶL/e}iεA_;U|g[Olبq KnW2VS \#6Dh #lIc6Ah}{ivrM-hkbXTk傟_ {udAk AgmtއΓ75V@-#/yF$Y>au"3EY٤{V?+̤ĭ+|% sPf`2سs >|T+Ö{+6S]qu6…(1OFK dg~$ |EӉ:5 c~Nk9/sM'/`? wI6S/ uٴYN8#]!?yPSOma!H).hꍼ޴XEsK|lnNmET'^78oݛ*gw)WYҋn(IQTt/ d7Ѷagg) endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-Italic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 13 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F6 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.67 >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 19 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 20 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 22 0 R >> endobj 22 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1576 >> stream x}WMs6WloɌ (Jxƙ&qf2M&!5 hEI~p߂-uP_A...}ɩ.;Yk.nV4-*D,iU)h%R޺ ;굩'QU+TMl7n@l^$MM4xy `_I|92[}}uKo&ZOU}}MVSN+7>`{tO p YҞ`j|fmx,p} xUCtQ-N~w%DAwcb홿TL!?1Ĵx EM80+K\^yaĆ .i/AHy%EiS[t`Sc@m8P+x}P-y·vj9N=mTXN.:1`vH.*d2%OʵrYdm}D|оřbXm w٪t| f' V;;Fr>YRN㡏^` }Vi6 )oQ~B['^`z5X̓W&pf$tBr,'ĚA:iRcfumDr1pvLێ5'%\ ajLYav*co-Mv'7\`_ DS "^8$J !DLYlȽuPPrz  cm06(v9l[|`jd)jN8|}Y=$b%?$b)*!Aq0C=~pu_B#ZH趌ɍ:8]7:uц@˔ʼeb7oڱdwxXHcݡ:ΚHZ=:\-FQ7)pY.yy@.ן۳K ix 1ƑءwcQ!{RԎՊռ ⓞ>&l0I``)rƦW6C>b]x?Wh1CʔioaN;xwMo̸Ldʹ="".Q2|\QZ)-Sb:;\_l,,S+yaYnAKύsj y+, ?9Ον5cm?S.PWg)ޒ܁CMƊ0mY_@Q8PmX`N+^bQI*c~l6*!-%!?vs<c۱3:]ʼng$-Uqlw^KZׂ~bQckԤTjV.sQMSj,3F`*y/N{Etߐ\X̎wF8c-c$DZtӆcя#*ΙE, lMH?FÅNS3.̧q a./7N4#0 B"0rY<{:eMIS endstream endobj xref 0 23 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000413 00000 n 0000000442 00000 n 0000000591 00000 n 0000000694 00000 n 0000002804 00000 n 0000002911 00000 n 0000003019 00000 n 0000003129 00000 n 0000003242 00000 n 0000003353 00000 n 0000003382 00000 n 0000003492 00000 n 0000003549 00000 n 0000003606 00000 n 0000003666 00000 n 0000003725 00000 n 0000003784 00000 n 0000003813 00000 n 0000003918 00000 n trailer << /Size 23 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<2311194c256fc97d2653138c1507f0cf><2311194c256fc97d2653138c1507f0cf>] >> startxref 5568 %%EOF FOCUS - The foolish gift | Caring Magazine

FOCUS – The foolish gift

Listen to this article

Reardon
by Lt. Amanda Reardon –


I was sitting at the Angel Tree in the posh Scottsdale Fashion Square Mall, collecting gifts for the underprivileged. In that mall, we’re accustomed to receiving nice gifts. But this occasion was special. A young man, probably in his early twenties, approached our table with three lawn-size garbage bags, completely full. We stood with our mouths agape as he opened the bags to reveal hordes of Star Wars toys. He had chosen three needy children from the tree, and was going to split the toys among them. I was a bit curious as to why someone would shower these children with so many of one type of toy. Then the young man’s mother explained to me that these were his personal collection. A close look at the toys made it obvious he’d been collecting for years, for some of them were older toys. But none had ever been opened. There wasn’t so much as a bent package. Though the giver reported that they had a value of $600, I am convinced they were worth even more.

It could be argued that the young man’s gift was a foolish one. These toys, so well-preserved, will now be ripped open and played with by children who will not understand their dollar value. Eventually, arms will be snapped off, accessories lost, and one or two might be left behind at a park or accidentally dropped behind the tire of a car. Actually playing with the toys means inevitable destruction, deterioration, or neglect. If this benefactor wanted to do a good deed with his collection, why not sell the toys and donate the money? Couldn’t more good be done that way?

Neither this scenario nor this line of reasoning are new. In John 12, Mary, sister of Martha and Lazarus, anointed Jesus’ feet with a very costly perfume. To Judas Iscariot, this was a rash act. He protested that the perfume could have fetched a hefty sum if sold, and the money could have been given to the poor.

If we are honest, most of us instinctively side with Judas on this issue. But Jesus reacted favorably to Mary’s deed, declaring: “You will always have the poor among you, but you will not always have me.” (vs. 8) This is difficult to understand. Who would be more in favor of helping the poor than Jesus? Why this indulgent response?

To my mortal mind, Mary behaved illogically. But God’s wisdom and man’s wisdom have never seen eye to eye. (I Corinthians 1:20) The experienced Christian has learned not to lean on his own understanding (Proverbs 3:5), but to defer to the Origin of all wisdom. We must tap in to his mind, think and act his way. Mary seems to have done this. It was godly logic, as Jesus made clear in verse seven, that she should prepare him for his burial with the perfume.

Perhaps more costly than the lavish material gift is the unfettered gift of the heart. While many a generous person may give of his financial resources, few are willing to make an emotional investment in another person without guarantee that it will yield some sort of return. How foolish to love if not loved mutually! How foolish to be kind to someone who is always rude to you! How foolish to forgive the unrepentant ones who have wronged you! The world teaches us to guard our hearts and nurse our grudges.

Following this line of thinking, perhaps the gift that would rate as most foolish was the gift of Jesus Christ. Would you send your only son to be murdered just to spare a selfish race who had mostly ignored you since its inception? Would you implore this race to reconcile with you and extend unconditional love to it? I imagine that if I were God, I would have blown up the planet and started fresh. We may not fully understand God’s expansive love, but we understand enough that it should prompt us to give foolishly likewise.

What gift is the Holy Spirit asking you to give? For some, it may be a material gift. For all of us, it is a gift of the heart. The old song, Banners and Bonnets, says: “Would you love the unloved, never reckoning the cost..?”

I applaud the young man who gave his Star Wars collection. I believe he was prompted by a godly logic. I suppose a friend or two will ridicule him, but I don’t think he’ll regret what he did. “This really makes him feel good,” his mother told me.

There’s just something about shunning man’s logic in favor of God’s. It feels right to be his fool.

You May Also Like