%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R ] /Count 1 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 13 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 14 0 R /GS2 15 0 R /GS3 16 0 R /GS4 17 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20250914193438+00'00') /ModDate (D:20250914193438+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1305 >> stream xWˎ6+p4zK.MAS$Y]0m3!)g$|jϥA`LK&/9UaHO_$syQIVҶS _D::~EKV+Z7m_oէAv$QdxJ QΈ|XOoVc0khŅ ]ihliSЇ>M v^Qs,`_X"B8aA|:Pbא3;q @fЋbY<DV]pBYw-/ĩVb{ݟ{{Nc TP@}x q'ID@ d_8KqNRŮ+)^|FyNٴ`|sS9;d&~yG  64WQTq ?Z"es6q fDwxVo endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 18 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj xref 0 19 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000383 00000 n 0000000412 00000 n 0000000561 00000 n 0000000664 00000 n 0000002042 00000 n 0000002149 00000 n 0000002257 00000 n 0000002367 00000 n 0000002480 00000 n 0000002509 00000 n 0000002619 00000 n 0000002676 00000 n 0000002733 00000 n 0000002792 00000 n 0000002851 00000 n trailer << /Size 19 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<17ac599ca2c1ac3ac8d794add1eb3027><17ac599ca2c1ac3ac8d794add1eb3027>] >> startxref 2880 %%EOF Change in program accreditation standards | Caring Magazine

Change in program accreditation standards

Listen to this article

With accreditation, Army programs can receive incentives.

 

The Western Territorial Social Services Department recently announced an improved version of the National Social Service Program Accreditation Standards, which were approved at the December 2012 National Social Service Commission meeting.

These standards will be used for pilot Territorial Program Accreditations through June 2013, and will then be modified based on suggestions from the field.

“We believe that these changes will provide a more streamlined and effective process for any program in the territory wishing to use the accreditation standards either for continued program enhancement or in preparation for a Territorial Program Accreditation Review,” said Major Lawrence Shiroma, territorial social service secretary.

This change came in response to the divisions’ desire to reduce the overall size of the accreditation standards document and the amount of time a program would need to prepare for a Territorial Program Accreditation Review. Through the revision process, the number of accreditation standards was reduced by 25 percent and the items requested while preparing for a Program Accreditation Review were reduced by 30 percent.

Programs throughout the territory may consider signing up for a Territorial Program Accreditation Review through the corresponding divisional headquarters. The Territorial Program Accreditation Review is a proven and time-tested way to measure a program’s effectiveness while identifying potential areas for growth and development.  Territorial incentives for participating include up to $2,000 for staff training and development.

You May Also Like