%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 20 0 R 22 0 R ] /Count 3 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 12 0 R /F6 14 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 15 0 R /GS2 16 0 R /GS3 17 0 R /GS4 18 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20250914131159+00'00') /ModDate (D:20250914131159+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1807 >> stream xXے}W].i_R[2V~xwߛӠ1*55ݧO786/\XKM䔬^vD{Mc+X-eQw,ɣwٺrW?pToa&t_8^w$*nM,WTQ2_ŏJ響Jebp wոCה_JcgQYSdQ/yL/yNVGڻI+ dHOd(nlJ;S.mFcO;#dY^rj$hH4C'IXv[Ԥ4&]^Qt!yi0GG>>Ckz^eoPjK:@3g7}k̯tk.KHoyodjAߚGF`dvyg?_C/S3h<00;rWrќ*7*v:NO"05-nr@ 2I#/83!|mBs+}F9;kخ@/eRם1LMwYD#^PM!`eZKz !iFt45rRh[x/T>}?YBnc4fptGM-ca:Vw12l34 1GJ@9Ѱ-prt!<A# c*u\ >gB"I\'@FFQK47ofGQA0|noL׭5>Wy}2mWZrx׮ek4rV G'teF\ Vv<&e-)E$?)"w'f&WJ//_=!%6׿| 9zDKZ);wBuװ`@wT! zoX0jZX{UGw8CUB`P*uP/zo04%u7j ;/nRr<[F& N_̠:w9q3{s5+:n̵y@Rx +Xax@&$NCQgEpBٰ(("n++=@A7&i:ϡ Є6}1g4$˦G KZʪKj'\NO QYipGt3K/-a踐 :tD}&ElCa,5Ł~eν- V4ә14AQc_ZW,Uwzr:J R.BiUL"3Ixo> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 13 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F6 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 19 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 20 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 21 0 R >> endobj 21 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 2050 >> stream xX˒WQhqf?uq豖bƱK4 ۺv&ُefCYUYUSA%γ05ȟ|)R<ٓ!Iė !<1z#{7z~Ko0lveYn^u"k_ү_4:INz)\%}}T]􂃍 $hPU R7T9HOvj=BoX#(#+9c}|Tx%J!ˍҢ&$!WY\& ΐu0wIt+EUgU%⽼N NKfm8ZМ9SHs%Qhc;qFbAxz`[ .Ihp6pGSY^XuWRDMx\wZ@o'kkWp&t5"`~WE'Eݟ{GOOA*%g=x[a7G訪=JMʒlMCOT,;,ߤxI@y(p׭Z!3T #<[I*u0*lduoU=Y댞8 Is=_Z5F v+3BT:ŦO:#n(cۑC^Q}N P0X-CJN# X%;b P^dE"Uyq>QDtƭ&sHxdJ ;k D&[Sx&RKk'z1cb̷+<`c'J)¬lA @rlp2pIPok(lO~*ZR4P=:γZbbQ1wF2O ggjx|Ԯ&DPU1/f^ viϤMRpXLui-3E$Gp9>ϊӒ|#| F2 _]ALU`⫃"g,g!>+)`'fL|,z0*]MwM0M0h=bCtU^y7+0mnȧF|MpBxu\TM|2O,}O# ~yAy µ3Ag;N9G'b0q92YjKUXZ٣Dp`ϟ iJzd<UNv2/}O,o{e৶NJM|ˏBsYuOi=yP K`K}(܋euF7Md/D $6!tL奉!>`D&f2O9 ! ؔ) UA|b +;3}Z.Ni_^?[i(&+9{%br8{AQ } ' JJsC5\@"εm}2F]o9+:v I/0ҌW#ؤ|RuZ /ţ‖!_K_,O/x+EyW0-&WwrbsfIs*^/>9 uc>x0T J!Rea-Ǹ-]ɿlSLX~{=7# ˂C4?/%@Wr wEĝiM/xCTR4q08hz goC*$g^?Τg10S)u#|3.]MJO]DG^дf/ ^3f+_*qlJ!j[W Ql+{JvHjܩ8l9 T}~,cu]C"wCx~}w"~h|}{~=?߅0~~Mf-=P ].?㥢bЩw+V!%\gdy?{2 endstream endobj 22 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 23 0 R >> endobj 23 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 417 >> stream x}n0yRqg?DH U܍DqZ^2n-xQo~,𵀙2"E8C*44:vGy=/& kV4)X-bw*247~|˳~tۓl|0ˏ֭*!)U5e>ky^M9iXŗ>2//Y endstream endobj xref 0 24 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000408 00000 n 0000000437 00000 n 0000000586 00000 n 0000000689 00000 n 0000002569 00000 n 0000002676 00000 n 0000002784 00000 n 0000002894 00000 n 0000003007 00000 n 0000003123 00000 n 0000003152 00000 n 0000003262 00000 n 0000003319 00000 n 0000003376 00000 n 0000003435 00000 n 0000003494 00000 n 0000003523 00000 n 0000003628 00000 n 0000005752 00000 n 0000005857 00000 n trailer << /Size 24 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[] >> startxref 6347 %%EOF On the Corner | Caring Magazine

On the Corner

Listen to this article

Insularity vs. Community

by Robert Docter, Editor-In-Chief –

It is true that people are affected in fundamental ways by the people with whom they choose to relate. This is true at any age. The nature of the child’s attachment to the maternal figure can closely affect the child’s personality development and willingness to venture forth and use or misuse freedom.

Some classic studies of identical twins reared in separate homes reveal important differences in personality. Some studies indicate startling changes in measurable intelligence as a result of changes affecting individuals socially.

People affect us, but we have the choice to determine the results.

Philip Yancy, writing in his book Soul Survivor – How my Faith Survived the Church, changed his early perception of Christianity from his upbringing in a highly exclusive and conservative southern church that advertised itself to the world as a “New Testament, Blood-bought, Born-again, Premillennial, Dispensational, fundamental …” you get the idea. He said: “Our little group of two hundred people had a corner on the truth, God’s truth, and everyone who disagreed with us was surely teetering on the edge of hell.” He changed as he came to understand the teaching of Jesus more fully, and broadened his reading of other Christian writers. He changed the nature of his relationships without losing the core of his belief system – Jesus.

David Brooks, writing an op-ed piece in a recent New York Times (Sep. 12, 2008), bemoaned the failure of his political party to move away from Barry Goldwater’s individualistic conception of conservatism as ‘Every man, for his individual good and for the good of society, is responsible for his own development. The political implications of this are clear,’ Goldwater wrote. ‘Conservatism’s first concern will always be: Are we maximizing freedom?’”

Brooks continued: “The problem is, this individualistic description of human nature seems to be wrong.” He then continues to explore briefly 30 years of research all “underlining one old truth – that we are intensely social creatures, deeply interconnected with one another and the idea of the lone individual rationally and willfully steering his own life course is often an illusion.”

“What emerges,” (from the research) Brooks writes, “is not a picture of self creating individuals gloriously free from one another, but of connections, relationships, institutions and social filaments that organize personal choices and make individuals what they are.”

Too many of us glorify the image of John Wayne on some dusty street in the old west protectin’ the town from the “bad guys” – or maybe, Clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry telling some hood to “… go ahead, make my day” – or maybe it’s Stephanie Plum in some Janet Evanovich novel doing her own thing without any help.

Then, we try to make the image a reality by living it.

These characters are insulated from the world. They live alone and seem to have a difficult time with relationships. They see the world through lenses that reveal only polarities. There are no shades of gray. They base their action choices on their own perceptions of good and evil, right and wrong. They present exciting drama. They are not representations of life as actually lived.

These flawed heroes and heroines become a model of individualism that tends to overemphasize the value of freedom to the near exclusion of the reality that we live in a world populated with other people. If they went to a church they’d arrive late and leave early. They seem to ignore any sense of responsibility to a broader community.

Going it alone does not result in building connections or institutions that fully provide opportunities for individual development. To do this, we must build community. It takes a group of people to do this. Such a group has common interests and shared goals. It is willing to invest time and energy in relationships, communication, negotiation, and commitment both to the process and the product of their joint effort.

Many Army corps have successfully developed such a community of worshippers. Some have done this very well. Unfortunately, too many of them fail to take the next step – that of becoming a strong participant in the broader community. They remain insular. We pride ourselves on serving the individual – “one person at a time.” Too often, in our insularity, we neglect following-up with that individual. We need to free ourselves from exclusionary practices and demonstrate a significant genuine interest and a willingness to invite them to participate in the established church community.

We also need to take the strength of our micro community and become more of a working participant in the macro community. What gain is there for evangelists who engage in exclusionary practices?

The uniform becomes a valuable tool for involvement in the broader community. It is easily recognized. The wearer becomes instantly “visible” in a world of invisible individuals. It speaks of a commitment to a higher order of things – to a belief system actualized with love for all humanity. Showing up, for example, at the town’s council immediately indicates a willingness to be involved. It shows a broader interest in the broader community – and it shows a desire to be part of helping examine current problems within that community.

Robert Fulghum ends his little essay titled All I really need to know I learned in kindergarten with this final sentence: “And it is still true, no matter how old you are – when you go out into the world, it is best to hold hands and stick together.”


You May Also Like