%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 19 0 R ] /Count 2 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 13 0 R /F6 21 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 14 0 R /GS2 15 0 R /GS3 16 0 R /GS4 17 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20251130003036+00'00') /ModDate (D:20251130003036+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1657 >> stream xWێ6}WZmm7mMdEZe]3=C^a")̙3gF8M߲7jeŚmkvcΒuힱ?y'zm3 Lwf;Uͬ4.R1ŝ?5a{(ϜO$ e2q_u |fo#H؉5~+8߽\$Q1;,WdV#J?~a%҂bͲubp ݷ <%w!s!akJׯU8Ic2ɢd_K^K<ꑷ|&HDd~z{쁷Gς!҂MDu!$Zʀ]w`JtFPFV|v ]4nIP=_h%/!y4`W}{I/g{i_+̺>G!Im8U%3#OA!#Tx#Tu(-CU) ZfJ3uKh[f'9HR&bRFR9+@'$E?j*r8)CLUuHH3zPHNL(Y*m+R+[eBuFy2 eVOv|fdl繈R!"BPEk8`b Rr%+B|Zm~M;qivm?$`&*s'd@؃>Qsr8({ Y_^'%shAdfܲn@/qj|b1ZiQΡjp@&Ηh~RԊg d{l|vo3G̦( VeV5FcpB҃0L\'ȝ\1퐛xJRȽ$H3Q"oBlӦbS(!"Y"|R\Ȥ/qӌ*@NLPǏ݃PR&ĺi\)kH?>4l;Jn{GGGG4 eaZ^xv6HDxKDet+ Y=LsIZEŜ@ ?4f?{uPPB{Z8@^S8!Yha3sQ\}##rZ[R>#5 B(!,I+zwBatⳐKOF_'%~MG h64!$h" Tnj2\pScXOa|ϭ;5BzbOKImm!c,('}B`}N#q5xPQQ1cyG:B1Pw})p'0 4[.{ w;R*Ni uDAg8 eܓkі& g "!s# k/ƒfIgL>:3iScS~4҉|H y$jZ*[lU3%~^!7#1Mh2[svL?Qd7`oa_(Ium[_Eu |^̢t6Y?T endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 18 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 19 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 20 0 R >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 878 >> stream xUM6WSZ߲r5HN큖h E:$e^ Eeqh޼lJifX&,IaMy9ӄeSJ3zK^cw"++'=alIj'ww{kғtnѣ$^;J -9JH ѹWGa}CjJVeUе[5v%5yfO_Gn`xw]wx={^M[ G5 1Z$J']ۈ`W#߄@FތOc?](W˳,R_胴FB{\ˁV(ʍ\//:mfNu)s t1.eʪ:p 5 2dM;΢0 5Gߓ/"xh2E`ĕeL(Ebt2iԽ0\՗?w71( B^|~}>o4 0:-woS b5:G-C[?*1إHc-*r٧`-q,庌Zɘ(ѣw |1u*,MbV@\rYE,cE[#Ec̒-[\ .|yE\o۫ν\5hb H=IZhƍoK碸_=Z$1)B(bQ hYku&aHx1DO]GìFhCt^)T +Nx.Q4X3NY ~iGRa701_Ԭe޽ g0 Gm0yõl:=JӚeyC (-2jpT#YgYŪԙgW>xH endstream endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F6 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj xref 0 22 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000401 00000 n 0000000430 00000 n 0000000579 00000 n 0000000682 00000 n 0000002412 00000 n 0000002519 00000 n 0000002627 00000 n 0000002737 00000 n 0000002850 00000 n 0000002879 00000 n 0000002989 00000 n 0000003046 00000 n 0000003103 00000 n 0000003162 00000 n 0000003221 00000 n 0000003250 00000 n 0000003355 00000 n 0000004306 00000 n trailer << /Size 22 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<8fa9fb1861416445d2a26ad0c3ed1ea6><8fa9fb1861416445d2a26ad0c3ed1ea6>] >> startxref 4422 %%EOF Report rates Army brand second in nation | Caring Magazine

Report rates Army brand second in nation

Listen to this article

Army brand valued

The Salvation Army is named the second most valuable nonprofit brand in America, behind the YMCA, in the recently released Cone Nonprofit Power Brand 100, a first-of-its-kind research study.

Cone, a strategy and communications agency engaged in building brand trust, collaborated with Intangible Business, a leading independent brand valuation consultancy in over 12 countries, to evaluate leading social service, environmental and/or animal-related nonprofits based on financial data, a consumer survey and other metrics.

“Through this valuation, we want to help nonprofits better understand how to protect and evolve their brands to generate as much revenue as possible,” says Alison DaSilva, executive vice president of Knowledge Leadership and Insights, Cone. “Valuing their brands gives them a license to demonstrate to companies and other partners that there is an established and justified cost to aligning with their organization.”

As a crucial component of the valuation, Cone conducted a proprietary national survey of 1,000 American adults to gauge the familiarity and personal relevance of each organization. These results, combined with other perception factors, including media coverage and the percent of revenue from direct public support, reveal the “brand image” of each organization.

By examining both a nonprofit’s image and its revenue, the research also uncovered a disconnect between some organizations’ brands and their financial performance. When either significantly outperforms or lags the other, it is an indication that there is unmet opportunity left on the table, in some cases millions of dollars in potential revenue.

“The goal of a brand valuation is to determine the amount of money a brand contributes to a nonprofit’s revenue,” explains William Grobel, international business valuation director for nonprofits, Intangible Business. “This critical synergy between an organization’s financial performance and its brand plays a significant role in generating additional funds to put toward mission services.”

The study revealed a number of insights into nonprofit issues. For example, 10 domestic social needs nonprofits were included in the top quarter of the list, proving that while the nation faces economic crisis, domestic social needs are most valuable to people. Though a majority of the environmental/animal-related nonprofits ranked in the bottom half of the list and had low brand rankings, these organizations have the highest growth spikes in revenue of all nonprofits studied.

Top 10 Nonprofit Power Brands:
1) YMCA of the USA
2) The Salvation Army
3) United Way of America
4) American Red Cross
5) Goodwill Industries International
6) Catholic Charities USA
7) Habitat for Humanity International
8) American Cancer Society
9) The Arc of the United States
10) Boys & Girls Clubs of America

From a Cone press release. Visit coneinc.com/nonprofitpowerbrand100 for a complete copy of The Cone Nonprofit Power Brand 100 and a detailed methodology.


You May Also Like