%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 23 0 R ] /Count 2 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 12 0 R /F6 13 0 R /F7 15 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 16 0 R /GS2 17 0 R /GS3 19 0 R /GS4 20 0 R /GS5 21 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20250831020844+00'00') /ModDate (D:20250831020844+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 2226 >> stream xYێF}WTb`/x:3C$Ƽlj?,{Hg&XF-vS븮KnxqCA?IQJ7]=$/u\YjٯBh XI^,>/(t<ן6+:>i p<.š~ÓVȥW8>ˡ^8z9d8N(vϼ1N.ﵕX?Y ?A@"ʜƟnkXu0Dc|}J4 \;` s"ohDHŘћ^xHI`u3h&XG&? Rѵ=?FR oFvt#nO/E䞾FhF 6 iBӁQ ƒ{WJE3l5#H]CHӈNQtS׼9~zwv0 +æ8^9xj~cFLb~ +ILG3z“ƍ'IDƮ 7 #u*5ȏďM jm$]RQU~z᧦eA׽襢մG&õ\:AmۯUy'Cr,B# mh?zԴ;ڭ`jn)պטoVP=A^}K"l3Km5骥߾n|,n%m:J~|@:is%Zϝlv~-zze/:/sQULf'y-ͶhE*FJ$)ͺT$66}LJDe0J*{J¸'6]w,e~/O(ݪl ԉ[vojn (BkQ `eNҚM.$GhGX ڵ۪U'BLb p|mY2du(:Zm1Ρ7{ƄQ6|zbѯ*M8I0~ PXI*tˎ>z벪he$z%lz*= #'lD]]]Kjڡl&ȿlduzó||beNDAi)AfuAvԾzFȥ2F TnZ_j ѬX6d.?16oQQM)W-7X4%Q!7cI(-$sc6m],9僊jd>A/yt/n؜7c>ۜNx%UjɒU  (1F$:Y$g7'ޝh@d%Df0#U(ij[#Z']lSm@ t**@׆it`H)oLmb3ZKѩ/Doj]g8+YE뉞u/;mIUZclPNvc-5cyQ=/ #CRS{szHl`i:fsj8TMc-h}8 mK}<o͗rШ3\?@<;4аsiY g14_íN+#zUۙy7:d>."Dg5ӝUX߹3TP$xeԃyAcz Fz2)տ_"~~R4>>@S?Kg?S- endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-BoldItalic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F6 /BaseFont /Times-Italic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 14 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F7 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 18 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 19 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.67 >> endobj 20 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 22 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 23 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 24 0 R >> endobj 24 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1221 >> stream xVM6ﯘZv/i 1C-Q:HHyVAXęy͐WoGԘ+yK 4&G.`V(_O\G9jڳ2AzGq9(=ԓp3Os!,$?gtXYd8{[q@Ŵ;4zkr+{0VtR78Qm+M}N%RBR`RIۚnrlUsKG+V dJCw1k&qb?a^'kK|ph qy%Bo={Vt.I[YA)}'d},8I`8|!p`>X]3%Yd14u d#wu#Iqa[kug7 װg/\ιswPOU,ƥo11kW!x}8qs4ջe6 endstream endobj xref 0 25 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000424 00000 n 0000000453 00000 n 0000000602 00000 n 0000000705 00000 n 0000003004 00000 n 0000003111 00000 n 0000003219 00000 n 0000003329 00000 n 0000003442 00000 n 0000003557 00000 n 0000003668 00000 n 0000003697 00000 n 0000003807 00000 n 0000003864 00000 n 0000003921 00000 n 0000003950 00000 n 0000004010 00000 n 0000004069 00000 n 0000004128 00000 n 0000004157 00000 n 0000004262 00000 n trailer << /Size 25 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<47c1dfd9e9c093696d25130eed6c118b><47c1dfd9e9c093696d25130eed6c118b>] >> startxref 5557 %%EOF On methods and messages | Caring Magazine
Read Caring Magazine Volume 29

Vol. #29

Hope in Action

Read Issue

Latest Impact StoriesView All

Popular Topics

PopularView All

On methods and messages

March 14, 2000
3 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
Listen to this article

THE BODY BUILDER

Camsey
by Major Terry Camsey –

In one way, the Army is like the United States Postal Service. We both deliver messages.

I don’t know whether you caught the broadcast by CNN a few months ago (October 22, 1999, to be precise) where they reported that E-mail is drastically reducing the numbers of letters people are sending. This, apparently, is having a severe impact on the letter delivery aspect of the postal service’s business.

The postal service was, as I remember, expressing concern that this trend would greatly affect the ability of people to write good letters. My impression was that it spelled the end of the civilized world as we knew it! (Or, as Sir Winston Churchill put it at one point during World War II, if not the beginning of the end…perhaps the end of the beginning!)

One had the nasty feeling, however, that the postal service faces this predicament because–like so many other companies–they have failed to define their business adequately. They seem not to have clarified whether their business is to deliver letters (snail mail–a method) or to deliver messages (releasing them to constantly seek better ways of doing that). It is a not uncommon dilemma and one which other companies have faced over the years…railroads, for example, who failed to define their business as transportation and free themselves to look for better ways of transporting goods and people.

This, for the postal service, begs the question should their response be to insist that people write letters so that they can stay in business and thrive? (in other words to “push” the “product” they already have… delivering letters?) Or, should it be to redefine their business as delivering messages, thus freeing them to stay abreast of the most effective way of doing this? If they had done this already, perhaps they might now be on the cutting edge of Internet communications and constantly on the alert for even better ways to deliver messages.

As I have suggested, from one perspective, we are in the same business as the postal service. And we, too, must not confuse delivery of the method with delivery of the message. The message may not change, but effectiveness of delivery of that message can vary significantly according to the method chosen. Should not we, too, be constantly on the alert for ways to more effectively and efficiently deliver the Good News… the most important message the world has to hear. Should not we, too, be heavily invested in exploration of ways that enable us to respond to the changing way in which many now prefer to receive the message.

And what does that imply about the way the organization responds at all levels to the challenge? Should the style be of controlling, directing, enforcing delivery of method? Or one of resourcing, facilitating, supporting delivery of the message?

I recently watched the film “Brassed Off’ again and was reminded of the tremendous pain change can bring. The pain of realizing that, although supplies of coal were plentiful, its use as a fuel had come to an end and pits were being closed and jobs lost. The reality was that newer, cleaner, preferred ways of generating energy had been discovered. In such circumstances, the miners could protest and insist people buy coal until they were literally as well as practically black in the face! To no avail.

When an external environment changes, our choices are to respond or not. Our future depends on the choice we make.

To a distressed person who came to him for help, the Guru asked, “Do you really want a cure?’
 “If I did not, would I bother to come to you?”
“Oh yes. Most people do.”
“What for?”
“Not for a cure. That’s painful. For relief.”

To his disciples, the Guru said, “People who want a cure, provided they can have it without pain, are like those who favor progress, provided they can have it without change.”

(Anthony De Mello, S.J. One Minute Wisdom,
Image books)
Download this page as a PDF

You May Also Like