%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 20 0 R ] /Count 2 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 12 0 R /F6 14 0 R /F7 22 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 15 0 R /GS2 16 0 R /GS3 17 0 R /GS4 18 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20250901095858+00'00') /ModDate (D:20250901095858+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 2351 >> stream xYrF}WU˾,EJ<Đ(.]zO̡ 9e ӧ/38q84'g&c ]t< 7]Ή~{:CתZTN?ѳ˓'n BI$r00|悑V.mȡLlWYόvE9.''~h Sy"-.|_WlZg8 SN_\h3]P{qͳ7OCg|'(9JPAR ^vH!Lhѥ-ge#{HC HR,^˿%M,GNHfYtŖ*9ֵm-gך_J7PzZ͟)w8 Ȝ"a('+D..Jir =5]d*-ՅjLeU3T9HGzSIZe5Efkmvš"PU% FGMyfȼ|/JV͍xSj32l9Y1 /Y+JYjjdN3f5 k]TVj赠3X.eJi=E?\ΗJ'j70M* fczK '纞IlK!eۏDćs#TWVVU66(`0Z \}ʴ '3S=E7l?ƴ q˒MzǴ{Q5y,"Nx8r5c9aBA-=TEtwo'DXq#(Uĩ 4?^(֕R+oW(ok783p?hx7IC#8>g"qSސuDKЩ |_84q|aCzowF'f8յ*YPfqq S[=ldG4}h+ V[p(ar]H" o]qǼc (qE_h_a/U/TSn>UF#SrGެdmC=Y3]֌45cblS|W1Q8Wǔ[|:e*6{zG;ޑ{ob R:v\:oA;+Fw8i)(¡ bb 1c2q$=Py 󁩂 M<OzEr8dV^£EK5e9:M (1[r?΄FH௒*ax}tQ :-C|ή\ l\P-4R!\Ӻ(u0ټz]S+7,+#m1-RHNA4[t@C|Soʺ7IT%we y-yk48f] t}R]sӊ'G7a)FB檙FM{ū 0M<h,ޘRf&pH:X`V k׍5h@sL8e'MWhk+<Q׋DlM:[ZΚ@)?\=pE *|E"yjT[zmoZvC_Wh N qn~ʃ{{N'iURU>aQZ,$i4`}_x.. )0)O`ˋ7RqѫxRȖo߾|+xƔ.[K"ƖJΡd;+rӡc!8Rsۭ~?"+. †z"?ȇmW?OOgFO٫^ _q< >#ׅ~J) % Stolo{3=Bdo˺ɻ9- endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 13 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F6 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 19 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 20 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 21 0 R >> endobj 21 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 475 >> stream xSMo0+HeTz­5fH;&h1x{Ϟ |CkLjDQul 6qJ,S 9P5?Nw''Tcʔyv p}SsH vp׭@-j5whhPrIBWv>L# ZhFLzQZBoZq$_ճS}ބq 1c<8:ePVy1jOJ(ތ%L} asHW4#Y,4 mk endstream endobj 22 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F7 /BaseFont /Helvetica-BoldOblique /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj xref 0 23 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000412 00000 n 0000000441 00000 n 0000000590 00000 n 0000000693 00000 n 0000003117 00000 n 0000003224 00000 n 0000003333 00000 n 0000003442 00000 n 0000003555 00000 n 0000003671 00000 n 0000003700 00000 n 0000003810 00000 n 0000003867 00000 n 0000003924 00000 n 0000003983 00000 n 0000004042 00000 n 0000004071 00000 n 0000004176 00000 n 0000004724 00000 n trailer << /Size 23 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<122c98f8a83cc3f741b9d65ef8994ec0><122c98f8a83cc3f741b9d65ef8994ec0>] >> startxref 4844 %%EOF Majoring in minors? | Caring Magazine

Majoring in minors?

Listen to this article

BODY BUILDER

by Major Terry CamseyI’ve been reading, occasionally and for purely recreational purposes, through a book called The Stupidest Things Ever Said By Politicians. One particular passage caught my eye the other day and–as often happens–one thought led to another…

The article relates to a memo sent, apparently, from one Dennis M. Boggs, sometime Acting Chief, Manpower and Organization, Department of the Air Force. This is how it read (in the interests of space I will only quote a sampling)…

“The following Air Force Material Command (AFMC) units are redesignated as indicated.

 

Current Designation New Designation
377th Civil Engineering Squadron 377th Civil Engineer Squadron
HQ 645th Civil Engineering Group HQ 645th Civil Engineer Group
645th Civil Engineering Operations Squadron 645th Civil Engineer Operations Squadron
645th Civil Engineering Maintenance Squadron 645th Civil Engineer Maintenance Squadron
647th Civil Engineering Squadron 647th Civil Engineer Squadron
648th Civil Engineering Squadron 648th Civil Engineer Squadron
649th Civil Engineering Squadron 649th Civil Engineer Squadron
650th Civil Engineering Operations Squadron 650th Civil Engineer Operations Squadron

 


Can you spot the subtle change? Every reference to “Engineering” has been changed to “Engineer.” Deep stuff!

It reminded me of a similar list published a few years ago in one of the major London (UK) newspapers. The Salvation Army had transposed the descriptor “Secretary” from the front of a host of designated positions to the back. The whole listing was published questioning how The Salvation Army could possibly have managed for so many years without this kind of top leadership. I felt it was embarrassing for the Army. It certainly embarrassed me.

We now have another major change whereby it has been decreed we retired officers may no longer use the designation (R) after our names. We can use (Rtd) or (Retired) but not (R). This decision–made at the very highest level–has, apparently, been reached in the light of comments received from officers and from extensive discussion over past years. It seems that the meaning of the designation (R) is not immediately obvious.

Now, to be candid, it doesn’t matter one whit to me what designation follows my name. But (tongue in cheek), I wonder if (Rtd) is any clearer. Might it not–by some–be interpreted as “Rusted,” or “Rented,” or “Re-routed,” or “Retracted,” or “Retreaded”….

One retired officer suggested to me one or two other possible designations that may not have been considered… (DIS)–dismissed, (LG)–let go, (POTP)–put out to pasture, etc. Readers may have other suggestions.

But, what’s my point?

Simply this. How does such a change of designation facilitate accomplishment of our mission or achievement of goals? How can we afford to have “extensive discussions” on such trivial matters?

Shouldn’t we be asking this question of all we do: “How does this facilitate accomplishment of our mission or achievement of our vision?”

If we can’t answer the question, shouldn’t we question the action?

You May Also Like