%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R ] /Count 1 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 13 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 14 0 R /GS2 15 0 R /GS3 16 0 R /GS4 17 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20250831164630+00'00') /ModDate (D:20250831164630+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1082 >> stream xV]o6})Ң>Y Y amQ6WLH*?Pe°sHY’$ng(+XV,hU]N|Z5D]Ku $Y+o쫿iuErƓq&9+-J}͈ṫ+t9)+A0/?8+&{a5geYQ0>O ΐ6^֌.ܙɗakikUD` \ c*$pGl'Q8\.X4~&7=RwoVRGuZcUyJoP'hViѢXj44ҩ57ƽQ/X.cVJĞB!"}f8.f.Z-| 7\G(|b|`> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 18 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj xref 0 19 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000383 00000 n 0000000412 00000 n 0000000561 00000 n 0000000664 00000 n 0000001819 00000 n 0000001926 00000 n 0000002034 00000 n 0000002144 00000 n 0000002257 00000 n 0000002286 00000 n 0000002396 00000 n 0000002453 00000 n 0000002510 00000 n 0000002569 00000 n 0000002628 00000 n trailer << /Size 19 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<9e0f60030d80bd33409408bb989735b3><9e0f60030d80bd33409408bb989735b3>] >> startxref 2657 %%EOF Letters to the editor | Caring Magazine
Read Caring Magazine Volume 29

Vol. #29

Hope in Action

Read Issue

Latest Impact StoriesView All

Popular Topics

PopularView All

Letters to the editor

September 4, 2004
1 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
Listen to this article

Letters to the editor

Evaluating the territory

A number of questions arise after reading “New Frontier evaluates territory” (including “On The Corner,” an addendum to the article) in the July 24, 2004 issue of New Frontier.

1. When you say “New Frontier evaluates the territory,” who exactly does that include? Who is the New Frontier? What qualifies the “New Frontier” (whoever that is) as a straightforward, unbiased and unfettered observer? Once the answer to that is revealed it may raise a number of other questions in the minds of many.

2. The example of the “new Lieutenant’s system” as a “second order change” was also noted. Exactly how does this differ from the “old Auxiliary Captain’s” system apart from semantics and a few other structural changes? Is there flexibility built into the new system as originally intended and designed? If so, that would indeed make this a “second order change.” If not… ? I know that there are many who would be interested in clear cut answers to these questions.

Joe Noland, Commissioner
La Quinta, CA

Download this page as a PDF

You May Also Like