%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R 21 0 R ] /Count 2 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 12 0 R /F6 14 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 15 0 R /GS2 16 0 R /GS3 17 0 R /GS4 18 0 R /GS5 19 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20251109054425+00'00') /ModDate (D:20251109054425+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 2043 >> stream xXMFϯc &bx6 CCl! , WMJ#tbaXzȪWU^u*AP_pKq~dy.ⴠۊ$" ݘrn=Ћ~cNUOۗ+JDD8LD_qG0/eN/ސK[x9q |,) D8_렮\vV2#+R5cҕ~x2d=j !f߳߄T[F|zHgJDI830:s}A/e,dE_OżCZ$bU҃*G3od6=s|ltiGՏj8%΂\QG 9J'ԝ@!8^h-˕ഒJR  o$B9T/ ]_қS^"'xJqZpŒ ! xp8 ţ`@O,J/.+'o.*rOA DžӃ]q^r-pOoU#$Q;0>oէANVfڶFi}rbSoTn 6HVqq!i-A7W&D7΀ZFW?'q9/~wߝۅDU\;N "dF nG'\ +FU +^}wf<.Qz\jK%h[ k Z&WOvj8X%>>nkQ)魆PB Mma: {N3B2.+R;• 1/F4PK{Cwr0vvNެD>Rj6+tG[X>8[;(hZr:\{+2? WRaJѸ^@Ö$o#)s/iŒ6,v :(VRu1LoPQM9ߪlzӚZ3%ʎ[Ưn]O,PY?9#؊GN;^ -6natfw~Pݚ5kѽOFjp"?g!q' g~pb{ u-̀:o iduxYVfOifk<` 2\>`}<6 ϙ|_Ȕ5xX8rYqwo1sw,X"rP_"GhnΈ.ݡౖ68Ȭ9;'*vETw lKZ03B#[vⴅp:L=ƥ ٻs=n>3)Kq-|tB9%Feu P68€TgFe0pixvgiV_1xkA ف Al&yO2>#}f֘u#i"FN/ Wm;u-a9Uhf׸֜c~?{;/(O#w=h %G`jɆ_Cgϧc8nϞN A8ԯ0Q"½5YN)_fcLp,g $ endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-Italic /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 13 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F6 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.67 >> endobj 18 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 19 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 20 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 21 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 22 0 R >> endobj 22 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1793 >> stream x}XMsW1@G..{c;Tr*9rp,C D?cH/HԆ;,_}HE)o6Lke2zl'P<3նDz܉N ;j:@!4c05!:_~L'7v55ttnhklmh㙜;`Z.h|pÌ5 нFP=cƻ^T J-}x !Et]0c72ޟ]x>vvU88Dg1>b1DrC2T|@gV#WP^m7@F`ۃnF'?zXy6^9QgQ;;HG&zfrk j2no*כW!kxb&~!4-:3IHzpGRAȄoTLqU{ݘNz|6"JA@7V$үfF:wCNF>Hz룩Ɏ. I2{wkE__H& AHv06J3ݺpz㬀imt ťl6xd!eJ3RA xT!!)ŀ$A`D&+{,=L)#}_.ʔ&p)TYv$3Mn3<+?DY',L6"X\nfj^ vUdm%KͰȵԦH1_Uz$z|G3n^J77u) ;lH @ KԳ p<8{].+*^ ZOλ+f@& %cE߲cAa*88W_}G)hR˔^l#{0',g,py8al=vLR^Q+#%Ǐx/ʨǃXZ2ڼ2cǪWpta}JEjq),,h>ϺyIl`{\I{>I7呕{Q?[ 4T~6ff%&=4rVerL١ήD1dٙ;fZD7y' ԭq\P%]WiY[ 6nԺؼxGJs[G~#5}PW>ZbqQ7VO%.}kVf~_k endstream endobj xref 0 23 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000413 00000 n 0000000442 00000 n 0000000591 00000 n 0000000694 00000 n 0000002810 00000 n 0000002917 00000 n 0000003025 00000 n 0000003135 00000 n 0000003248 00000 n 0000003359 00000 n 0000003388 00000 n 0000003498 00000 n 0000003555 00000 n 0000003612 00000 n 0000003672 00000 n 0000003731 00000 n 0000003790 00000 n 0000003819 00000 n 0000003924 00000 n trailer << /Size 23 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<8b2c366e66dfd26af826f1fab3d97c8e><8b2c366e66dfd26af826f1fab3d97c8e>] >> startxref 5791 %%EOF Focus - Fully Informed | Caring Magazine
Read Caring Magazine Volume 29

Vol. #29

Hope in Action

Read Issue

Latest Impact StoriesView All

Popular Topics

PopularView All

Focus – Fully Informed

May 26, 1999
3 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
Listen to this article

read
by Dr. James Read –
Director – Salvation Army Ethics Center

“We’re a married couple who have been trying unsuccessfully for about six years to have a baby. Friends have suggested that we inquire about IVF (in vitro fertilization), but before we go ahead we’d like your advice. We’re leaders in our church, and it’s very important that we consider whether IVF is ethically all right, not just something we really want.”

That was the gist of an e-mail message that came to the Ethics Center recently. Even across the impersonal internet I could hear the pain of this couple because they, along with about 15 percent of all couples, couldn’t have a baby in the “natural” way. The story reminded me of Hannah (1 Samuel 1). I hoped they were getting Christlike compassion from their congregation. I knew I couldn’t supply that. My support would have to be by way of ethical principles to inform their decision-making. What to say?

In some of my talks I emphasize social justice. The procedures needed to diagnose and treat infertility, and the systems to support these new reproductive technologies, are very costly. Meanwhile there are thousands of already-living children who suffer without parents to love them. On a global scale there’s something unfair about this.

While I hoped that my e-mail correspondents had considered adopting a child, I chose not to raise this as an ethical concern. The injustice of orphaned children is not the special responsibility of childless Christian couples.

I did advise them to inform themselves fully about the procedures that would be involved. Reputable medical professionals will insist that their patients understand the risk factors before consenting, because infertility treatments can pose significant physical and emotional risks. But there are other issues to be informed about too.

For example, most fertility clinics will expect a couple to be open to the use of “donor” sperm or egg. Not all Christian ethicists object to the use of donors, seeing an analogy to organ or blood donation–ethically praiseworthy actions. Others, however, note the differences between sperm and blood. Few would feel wronged if they didn’t know whose blood was transfused into them, but many would feel wronged if the identity of the person whose genes they bore was kept from them.

And, I would want this couple to ask, will there be “surplus embryos”? Clinics will not try to fertilize just one egg. The chance of failure is too high. So there will probably be several new lives in the petri dish. What will become of them? If all are transferred to the womb, the question may come up about whether all will be able to be carried safely to term. “Selective reductions” –in which some of the developing fetuses are aborted–may be proposed. A couple in that situation will inevitably face the agonizing matter of considering death of some for the life and health of others.

On the other hand, refinements in the technology available in some clinics may mean that donors don’t have to be used or selective abortion contemplated.

Official Catholic teaching would say that IVF is unethical even then. It is wrong, according to this perspective, for any action to separate the “procreative” from the “unitive” aspects of marriage. I don’t agree with this because, for one thing, experience shows that the loving union of a married couple can be strengthened by not having to worry each time whether pregnancy will ensue. However, the Catholics are getting at something important. And that is, that children have a right to be procreated in love not merely produced as a technological marvel.

“Once begetting is acknowledged to be under the laws of time and motion efficiency, then its absorption into the world of productive technique is complete,” says the Anglican theologian Oliver O’Donovan. “I do not know how to think of an IVF child except as the creature of the doctors who assisted at her conception.”

Now, baby-making technology doesn’t have to generate that attitude, and that’s what I said to the couple that wrote. But too often it does. Especially in a world in which kids conceived in the old-fashioned way are often treated by their parents as property and products and projections of adult ego.

Central to Christian ethics is the principle that parents don’t own their children. Kids are independently valuable images of God which parents are trusted to love. So a birth is not a sign of accomplishment, but of being blessed. And whether we are needing technological assistance or not, all parents need the grace to remember that children are to be received as gifts, not fashioned as products.

Download this page as a PDF

You May Also Like