%PDF-1.7 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Outlines 2 0 R /Pages 3 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Outlines /Count 0 >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Kids [6 0 R ] /Count 1 /Resources << /ProcSet 4 0 R /Font << /F1 8 0 R /F2 9 0 R /F3 10 0 R /F4 11 0 R /F5 13 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 14 0 R /GS2 15 0 R /GS3 16 0 R /GS4 17 0 R >> >> /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] >> endobj 4 0 obj [/PDF /Text ] endobj 5 0 obj << /Producer (dompdf 3.1.0 + CPDF) /CreationDate (D:20250913095749+00'00') /ModDate (D:20250913095749+00'00') >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /Page /MediaBox [0.000 0.000 612.000 792.000] /Parent 3 0 R /Contents 7 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1500 >> stream xWM6W̱\}midPhD$e3MDr̛7"bQӴWkHs(K+X7pKEýZ9]'ZFBV-촕?k#鸓Z;s'yUpb^˖?8J._8c9JeIu*O^2;:.ϙpz~zY~7cV%a5b~ye%cINi "X?Eo=GfojT f훇ZK!I^lUcb(Y2A셺,?8{E(=H&aYk9xZwjW%>;1^"Ea*44C"H3yjE1+F5zŽY p$uѭ= Ke >Smd{=^#R⪊i@?%X lʤpgע5BTbKvHȚwѱia4nz&JVJkĕ4M^`P e?2XlD:n0gH YymeHcgٵBa+1schFlv>#VEu}l@y7$ʓLeisMcWw3 !q"dhu۩C[(q#P=wVwQD+@{Qp,,M*eUַʣw}fn7[mGt{ .E"+sV0uț~-P|~ gŴ y'Jr&ì(XZ$[Y?Ԗh=zizyK+q$W\ts7Q[JK1a e6nw |4'n?& 1Ԥ>ѐ@{@:F/I<$f|0R i]6K\`?t5> 7Ct y+ɵwٓ X+]oHoB[wBb.CM 瀢 |glI( R8xBMDB) 47qv67X5`lb8@j% x~kQܸ-x{r_)!1`no"4MGJc2pwMhrNcZ,)s;#Dڔ>O ]JO嫀DXc-ž2){ SA]^Q9inb]Z,gEi0SL3ٱq d/敧ckm/T)AUMq$yOҗk7{$ӭ\YgOOf6-,bUQM ǘ !\%".JF1@y>L p.mg9\< endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F1 /BaseFont /Helvetica /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4 /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 12 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding >> endobj 14 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 1 >> endobj 15 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 1 >> endobj 16 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /CA 0.3 >> endobj 17 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /BM /Normal /ca 0.3 >> endobj 18 0 obj [6 0 R /Fit] endobj xref 0 19 0000000000 65535 f 0000000009 00000 n 0000000074 00000 n 0000000120 00000 n 0000000383 00000 n 0000000412 00000 n 0000000561 00000 n 0000000664 00000 n 0000002237 00000 n 0000002344 00000 n 0000002452 00000 n 0000002562 00000 n 0000002675 00000 n 0000002704 00000 n 0000002814 00000 n 0000002871 00000 n 0000002928 00000 n 0000002987 00000 n 0000003046 00000 n trailer << /Size 19 /Root 1 0 R /Info 5 0 R /ID[<28a6f1a5b377a4ec84930e7a54ea2525><28a6f1a5b377a4ec84930e7a54ea2525>] >> startxref 3075 %%EOF Crestmont College receives strong positive accreditation review | Caring Magazine

Crestmont College receives strong positive accreditation review

Listen to this article

Seven accreditation team members from the Western Association of Schools and Colleges visited Crestmont College recently and delivered a strong endorsement of the college’s officer training program.

Crestmont’s School for Officer Training, accredited since 1990 to grant an Associate of Arts Degree in Ministries, is periodically reviewed for reaccreditation status, but this is the first review under the expanded Crestmont College structure, according to Dr. Dennis VanderWeele, provost. “This first visit for Crestmont was felt to serve as a signal evaluation for the planning and strides taken towards the BA program, as well as the continuing strength of the AA degree. It was difficult to envision a stronger and less ambiguous signal,” VanderWeele said.

In the two-and-one-half days spent on campus, according to VanderWeele, the accreditation team of administrators and instructors from six California colleges assessed Crestmont’s physical plant, mission and integrity, financial status, governance, student support and development, library and information resources, and the entire academic program.

“Of the ten standards reviewed, the college received recommendations for producing improvement in only two,” VanderWeele said. “On the other eight standards, there were no recommendations, indicating the strength and sufficiency of the existing program in the eyes of the reviewers.”

Remarks by the team’s leader, Dr. J. Christopher McCarthy, executive vice president for instructional services at Glendale Community College included the comment that in his twenty-one years and over forty evaluations, he could not recall an accreditation evaluation with so few recommendations. These included expanded institutional research, planning and assessment of staff development and student outcomes, and continued evaluation of the educational programs, in this time of the college’s growth.

You May Also Like